Solutions
One set of facts
for everyone
The same verified data, cut for the person using it - the buyer allocating a budget, the board answering for a target, the brand supplying the evidence.
Retailers & marketplaces · owns the brand list and the sustainability mandate
Which of these brands
can we stand behind?
Hundreds of brands, each making claims that cannot be compared. Every brand you carry scored on one published method, with the documents behind each score.
We keep it in a spreadsheet, brand by brand. It is out of date before we finish it.
Brands · owns your own certifications, policies and disclosures
How many times do we
have to prove this?
Your assessment and the evidence behind it, with a way to respond and supply what is missing. Prove it once, and every retailer reading the same method sees it.
We send the same evidence to every retailer that asks, in whatever format each one wants it.
Kestrel & Co.
Outerwear · Portugal · 38 documents on file
Buying teams · owns the purchase budget and brand selection
Where does the budget
actually go?
You own the purchase budget and the brand list. Criteria in euros beside margin and sales, and the proof next to the decision instead of a question for the sustainability team.
If I need a brand's certificate, I ask the sustainability team and wait.
Buying rules
v7 · locked 4 Mar- Minimum IQx 45Blocks the orderDealbreaker
- Materials weighted x2Applied at every decisionLocked
- No unevidenced claimsBlocks the orderDealbreaker
- Prefer EU manufactureRanks, does not blockPreference
Applied, not remembered
Boards & ESG · owns the decision, ultimately
Can we defend
this number?
Turnover-level risk and board-safe evidence, not features. The document behind a headline number available on request, rather than a week of digging.
When someone asks to see the number behind it, that is a week of digging.
Board pack
Q3 FY26 · v4- Portfolio IQxwas 58.1 last quarter62.4
- Evidenced brandswas 141 last quarter184
- Brands below barwas 37 last quarter23
Appendix · 412 documents behind these figures
Sustainability teams · owns pledges, certifications and brand vetting, often manual
What can each brand
actually substantiate?
You own the pledges and the vetting, usually by hand. Every score traces to the document behind it, so proof is not assembled from scratch at each audit.
I assemble the proof from scratch at every audit, out of inboxes and shared drives with no owner.
Evidence Library
Marlow & Field · 12 on file
GOTS certificate #8812global-standard.org · snapshot 12 Aug 2026Valid
OEKO-TEX Standard 100oeko-tex.com · expires 30 Sep 2026Expiring soon- Supplier audit reportUploaded PDF · analyst-checked 3 Jun 2026Valid
Fair Wear membershipfairwear.org · removed 14 Feb 2026Expired
AI shopping agents · owns the warehouse, the feed and the numbers other teams argue with
What can we
safely recommend?
Verified attributes as a feed rather than another dashboard. Recommendations that hold up because a person checked each fact before it counted.
We would take a verified attribute feed into the warehouse. Another dashboard, no.
6,214 assessed · 184 in your book
What we have measured
- 6,000+
- Brands ready to include in your Collections with more added daily
- 16,000+
- Certifications and standards ensure provenance for claims
- 500+
- Data points per brand constitute the broadest coverage in the market
- 280+
- Unique brand attributes
See your own portfolio
at the first meeting.
Send us the brands you carry and we will have them scored before we speak. Nothing to install, nothing to prepare.